Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 00:52
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Week in Review: Perplexity Labs wants to do your work - TechCrunch
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What was your most embarrassing and humiliating bare bottom spanking?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What do flat Earthers think causes the "magical downward force"?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
FDA Gives Tomato Recall Over Salmonella Highest Risk Warning - TODAY.com
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What’s next?
End of an Era: Landsat 7 Decommissioned After 25 Years of Earth Observation - USGS (.gov)
Russia can stop this any time.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What was your best sex experience that still makes you horny?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Thank you.
Let’s just make it real clear: